The ability to extract meaningful insights from vast amounts of information is more critical than ever, particularly in areas such financial services. Traditional search and retrieval methods, while useful for basic tasks, often struggle to meet the demands of fields where the quantity of data is overwhelming and deeply interconnected and decisions must be made quickly.
Whether analysts evaluating stock valuations, traders assessing market trends, or portfolio managers balancing risk — need tools that go beyond delivering raw data and information to provide context and clarity. Advanced knowledge retrieval techniques, such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), Context-Augmented Generation (CAG), Graph RAG, and other cutting-edge approaches, address this need by combining retrieval precision with generative intelligence. These technologies are reshaping how financial insights are accessed, offering a level of sophistication that traditional systems cannot match.
I’ve been working and thinking in this area for several years not and this article provides a detailed exploration of these advanced techniques, focusing on their technical foundations and practical applications in financial services. I begin by examining the limitations of conventional retrieval methods, which sets the stage for understanding why innovations like RAG have become essential. From there, I move into a comprehensive discussion of RAG’s hybrid approach, followed by an exploration of CAG’s ability to tailor responses to individual users. Next, I delve into Graph RAG, which excels at navigating complex relationships, and conclude with a look at emerging trends like multi-modal retrieval and fine-tuning-free knowledge distillation. I hope you enjoy the journey!
What We Had Was Not Enough
Financial services operate in a domain where information is rarely straightforward. A single stock’s performance might be influenced by earnings results, shifts in commodity prices, regulatory announcements, or even weather events affecting supply chains. Traditional knowledge retrieval systems, built on keyword matching and ranking algorithms, are adept at finding documents but falter when it comes to integrating these factors into cohesive insight. For example, a financial analyst searching for the reason behind a sudden market dip might receive a collection of news articles and reports. Piecing together the cause — perhaps a combination of a central bank’s interest rate hike and a key company’s earnings miss — requires significant effort and expertise, which slows decision-making in a field where timing is critical, and failure is brutal.
This challenge becomes even more pronounced with questions that demand multi-step reasoning. Understanding how a new trade policy might affect a specific sector, such as automotive manufacturing, involves connecting dots across international tariffs, material costs, and company supply chains. Legacy approaches and systems lack the ability to follow these threads, often leaving user of this information with incomplete or fragmented answers — leading to dangerous false insights. Moreover, they struggle to adapt to the dynamic nature of finance, where fresh data — such as a breaking news story or a real-time market shift — can render earlier results obsolete. Such gaps and challenges highlight the need for more advanced approaches, ones that not only retrieve information but also interprets and contextualises it effectively and fast.
RAG: An Old-New Paradigm
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) marked a significant evolution in knowledge retrieval by merging the strengths of two distinct processes: information retrieval and natural language generation. In its first stage, RAG searches a large corpus — such as financial databases, news archives, or regulatory filings — to identify documents or data snippets most relevant to a user’s query. In the second stage, it passes this retrieved information to a language model, which generates a concise, coherent response tailored to the question at hand. This dual mechanism aims to ensures that answers are both grounded in factual data and presented in a way that is easy to understand. It works as designed — most of the time.
To illustrate, imagine a financial analyst asking, “Is this stock a good investment right now?” A traditional search might return a mix of historical performance data, analyst opinions, and market summaries, requiring the analyst to manually sift through and interpret the results. Of course, the question itself is simplistic and demands that any Machine Intelligence which the question is asked of is cognisant of what ‘a good investment’ means! Regardless of the question — RAG, takes a different approach. It might retrieve the stock’s recent earnings report, current market conditions, and industry trends, then generate a response like: “The stock has shown consistent revenue growth over the past year, but its high debt levels and a softening sector outlook suggest caution. A recent dip in share price could present a buying opportunity if upcoming earnings exceed expectations.” This output goes beyond raw data delivery, offering a basic but useful synthesised analysis that directly addresses the analyst’s needs.
The strength of RAG lies in its ability to balance accuracy and usability. By anchoring its responses in retrieved information, it avoids the pitfalls of standalone language models, which can sometimes produce plausible but incorrect answers when lacking up-to-date context. At the same time, the generation component transforms disparate data points into a narrative that feels intuitive, making it especially valuable in finance, where clarity can accelerate decision-making. This hybrid design positioned RAG as a foundational technology, paving the way for further advancements in retrieval systems. It is telling of the speed of innovation in this area to note that RAG although only a year or so old, is already considered a legacy approach.
CAG: Personalising Insights
While RAG offers a robust framework for delivering contextually rich answers, it assumes a uniform context for all users, which can limit its effectiveness in scenarios where individual preferences or circumstances vary. Context-Augmented Generation (CAG) builds on RAG’s foundation by incorporating user-specific details into the retrieval and generation process, enabling highly personalised responses. In financial services, where no two investors or institutions share identical goals or constraints, this customisation is a critical requirement.
Consider an investor querying, “Should I hold onto my position in this energy stock?” A standard RAG system might retrieve general market data and generate a response based on broad trends, such as rising oil prices or sector stability. CAG, however, takes into account the investor’s unique profile — perhaps accessed from a database of past interactions or preferences. If the investor has a high tolerance for risk and a long-term investment horizon, the system might respond: “Despite short-term volatility due to regulatory uncertainty, holding the stock aligns with your risk appetite, as its exposure to renewable energy projects could drive significant growth over the next five years.” Conversely, for a risk-averse investor, it might suggest: “Given your preference for stability and the stock’s recent price fluctuations, selling now could minimise potential losses.”
This personalisation is achieved by integrating user context into the system’s workflow. In some implementations, the initial retrieval query is modified to prioritise information relevant to the user’s profile — say, emphasising low-risk assets for a conservative investor. In others, the language model adjusts its output based on contextual cues, such as weighting factors like volatility or dividend yield differently depending on the user’s goals. While CAG is still maturing as a technology, its ability to tailor insights to individual needs makes it a powerful tool for financial professionals seeking advice that reflects their specific circumstances.
Graph RAG: Mastering Complex Relationships
Financial decision-making often hinges on understanding intricate relationships — how a policy change in one country ripples through global markets, or how a merger alters competitive dynamics within an industry. Graph RAG addresses this complexity by replacing traditional document-based retrieval with a knowledge graph, a structured framework where entities (like companies, commodities, or regulations) are represented as nodes, and their relationships (such as “supplies,” “owns,” or “influences”) as edges. This allows the system to perform multi-hop reasoning, connecting multiple data points to answer questions that require deep relational insight.
For example, suppose a trader asks, “How will a new import tax on aluminium affect this aerospace manufacturer?” A conventional RAG system might retrieve articles mentioning the tax and the company, but it may not fully grasp the broader implications. Graph RAG, by contrast, navigates the knowledge graph to trace the chain of impact: from the tax increasing aluminum prices, to higher costs for suppliers, to elevated production expenses for the manufacturer. It might then generate a response: “The import tax is projected to raise aluminum costs by 8%, which could increase the manufacturer’s expenses by roughly 4% due to its reliance on domestic suppliers. Unless offset by efficiency gains or price increases, this could shrink profit margins by 1–2% in the next quarter.” This level of analysis gets closer to mirroring the reasoning of an expert analyst, making Graph RAG uniquely suited to complex financial queries. We assume here of course that a good thinking or reasoning model is being used — a poor LLM will still produce poor results, regardless of the knowledge retrieval approach used.
The process behind Graph RAG typically involves encoding the knowledge graph into a format that the system can query — often using embeddings to represent nodes and edges or employing graph-specific languages to extract relevant subgraphs. These subgraphs are then fed into the generation model, which crafts a response based on the retrieved relationships. This structured approach excels in scenarios where answers depend on indirect connections, offering a depth of understanding that traditional retrieval methods cannot replicate. In finance, where anticipating downstream effects is often as important as reacting to immediate events, Graph RAG stands out as providing considerable advantage.
The Next Frontiers of Knowledge Retrieval
The progress of retrieval technology is not limited to refining text-based systems. Emerging approaches are expanding the scope of what these tools can achieve, addressing new challenges and unlocking additional value for financial applications. Among these advancements, multi-modal retrieval is particularly promising, as it integrates many types of data sources — text, images, charts, audio, and more — into a single framework. In practice, this could mean analysing a company’s earnings transcript alongside its stock price graph and a video of its CEO’s latest remarks looking for visual and emotional cues — ethical aspects aside. A query about the firm’s outlook might yield: “The earnings report shows solid growth, but the stock chart indicates a plateau, and the CEO’s hesitant tone during the Q&A suggests caution about near-term challenges.” This form of synthesis provides a richer perspective, aligning with how humans naturally combine multiple inputs to form judgments. Just how much the Machine Intelligence can help you here however depends on which jurisdiction you’re in and how much it allows you to profile a human’s behaviour using AI.
Another significant development is fine-tuning-free knowledge distillation, which tackles the problem of keeping Machine Intelligence current in a fast-paced environment like finance. Traditional models require periodic retraining to incorporate new data — such as a sudden market shift or a regulatory update — a process that is resource-intensive and time-consuming. Fine-tuning-free methods sidestep this by relying on a dynamic knowledge base, such as an updatable graph or external dataset, that the system queries in real time. For instance, if a central bank announces an interest rate cut, the system can immediately retrieve this information and adjust its response to a query about bond yields, without needing a model update. This agility ensures that financial insights remain timely and relevant, a critical advantage in a domain where conditions change by the minute.
Hybrid systems are also emerging, blending elements of RAG, Graph RAG, and multi-modal retrieval to handle increasingly sophisticated queries. A hybrid approach might use Graph RAG to map out relationships in a supply chain, standard RAG to pull in recent news, and multi-modal capabilities to interpret a related infographic — all contributing to a single, unified answer. Though these integrations are still in early stages, they point to a future where retrieval systems can seamlessly process and produce complex, multifaceted insights, offering unparalleled depth and flexibility.
Democratising Insight
The advancements discussed here are already making a tangible difference in financial services, enabling the industry to navigate information with greater speed and precision. Even in daily life, these technologies will empower individuals to ask complex questions — about personal finance, health, or global trends — and receive answers that are both accurate and tailored to their needs. We’re still not ‘there’ in terms of ensuring a lack of bias in an LLM response — or at least flagging such a bias — but we’re all that the start of the journey.
Knowledge graphs must be carefully maintained to ensure their accuracy and neutrality, a task that grows more difficult as datasets expand. Multi-modal systems face technical hurdles in aligning and interpreting diverse data types, while fine-tuning-free approaches depend heavily on the quality of their underlying sources. Still, ongoing research is steadily addressing these issues, refining these tools into ever more reliable instruments. My morning coffee is flipping through arxiv.org — you’re should be too!
We are well into the early days of a time where knowledge retrieval transcends simple search, becoming a process of understanding and contextualisation that rivals and surpasses human cognition. In finance, this means turning raw data into real-time actionable intelligence. More broadly, it signals a shift toward a future where sophisticated insights are no longer the domain of experts alone but are accessible to anyone with a question to ask.
Wouldn’t it be great to ask the question “Is there really a Nigerian prince with all this money to transfer to me?”


